ChatButton

JUDICIALIZAÇÃO NO ACESSO A MEDICAMENTOS: OS NÚMEROS NO PERÍODO DE 2019 A 2021 NO MUNICÍPIO DE PONTA GROSSA, PARANÁ
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Judicialization of health; Public policy; Pharmaceutical care.

Abstract

The objective of the research was to describe the profile of lawsuits regarding the supply of medicines in the city of Ponta Grossa, Paraná, between 2019 and 2021. A descriptive-exploratory and retrospective method was used, with a quantitative approach. A total of 89 processes were analyzed, most of which were female authors (57.3%), with a predominance of public legal assistance through the Public Prosecutor's Office (69.7%) and with prescriptions from the public service (96.6%). It was observed that 93.3% of requests were not included in the National List of Essential Medicines. Furthermore, there was a greater demand for the drug Avastin (31.5). The diseases that most affected the author were diabetic retinopathy (42.7%; n=38) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (24.7%). It is noteworthy that during the data collection period, 79.8% of the processes were concluded. The amounts spent on the legalization of medicines ranged from R$ 407.94 to R$ 47,220.00. Given the not exorbitant number of lawsuits, it is possible that there are effective municipal strategies, or the absence of a Public Defender's Office in meeting health demands, which may have become an inhibiting factor in access to justice. Another point regarding the delimitation of access, are the cumulative requirements signed in the thesis by the STF, regarding the concession of medicines not foreseen in the SUS dispensing lists. It is concluded that there is a need to improve the dialogue between the judiciary and the health sector through its managers, as well as to carry out more studies to support a mapping, planning, description of expenses with the judicialization, acquisition of medicines and incorporation of new technologies.

https://doi.org/10.22491/2447-3405.2023.V9.9e2
PDF (Português (Brasil))